Nampa Senior High School
203 Lake Lowell Ave
Nampa ID, 83686, Canyon County
Phone: 208-498-0551
Ranking: 
(136 out of 151, bottom 10%)*
(136 out of 151, bottom 10%)*Type: Regular High School
Status: Currently Operational
Grade: Grade 9 to Grade 12
School District: Nampa School District 131
Title I Eligible School: Yes School-Wide Title I: NA
Magnet: NA
Charter: NA
Shared-Time School: NA
Students and Teachers
| 2013-2014 | 2012-2013 | 2011-2012 | 2010-2011 | 2009-2010 | 2008-2009 | 2007-2008 | ||||||||
| Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | |
| Total Teachers: | 62 | 68 | 77 | 68 | 63 | 62 | 65 | |||||||
| Total Students: | 1,501 | 1,551 | 1,393 | 1,242 | 1,302 | 1,252 | 1,243 | |||||||
| Grade 9: | 422 | 28.1% | 437 | 28.2% | 417 | 29.9% | 349 | 28.1% | 372 | 28.6% | 347 | 27.7% | 374 | 30.1% |
| Grade 10: | 408 | 27.2% | 415 | 26.8% | 370 | 26.6% | 333 | 26.8% | 302 | 23.2% | 338 | 27.0% | 347 | 27.9% |
| Grade 11: | 346 | 23.1% | 358 | 23.1% | 319 | 22.9% | 262 | 21.1% | 315 | 24.2% | 320 | 25.6% | 274 | 22.0% |
| Grade 12: | 325 | 21.7% | 341 | 22.0% | 287 | 20.6% | 298 | 24.0% | 313 | 24.0% | 247 | 19.7% | 248 | 20.0% |
| Ungraded: | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
| Student By Gender: | ||||||||||||||
| Male: | 757 | 50.4% | 775 | 50.0% | 715 | 51.3% | 671 | 54.0% | 707 | 54.3% | 664 | 53.0% | 666 | 53.6% |
| Female: | 744 | 49.6% | 776 | 50.0% | 678 | 48.7% | 571 | 46.0% | 587 | 45.1% | 580 | 46.3% | 573 | 46.1% |
| Student By Races: | ||||||||||||||
| American Indian/Alaska Native: | 14 | 0.9% | 18 | 1.2% | 17 | 1.2% | 12 | 1.0% | 18 | 1.4% | 82 | 6.5% | 7 | 0.6% |
| Asian: | 23 | 1.5% | 27 | 1.7% | 27 | 1.9% | 17 | 1.4% | 20 | 1.5% | 21 | 1.7% | 18 | 1.4% |
| Hispanic: | 532 | 35.4% | 556 | 35.8% | 476 | 34.2% | 441 | 35.5% | 455 | 34.9% | 391 | 31.2% | 387 | 31.1% |
| Black: | 18 | 1.2% | 25 | 1.6% | 25 | 1.8% | 19 | 1.5% | 14 | 1.1% | 16 | 1.3% | 11 | 0.9% |
| White: | 903 | 60.2% | 906 | 58.4% | 825 | 59.2% | 719 | 57.9% | 795 | 61.1% | 742 | 59.3% | 820 | 66.0% |
| Hawaiian Native/Pacific Islander: | 11 | 0.7% | 15 | 1.0% | 18 | 1.3% | 5 | 0.4% | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
| Two or More Races: | 0 | 0.0% | 4 | 0.3% | 5 | 0.4% | 29 | 2.3% | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
| Lunch Program: | ||||||||||||||
| Free Lunch Program Eligible: | 748 | 49.8% | 848 | 54.7% | 777 | 55.8% | 670 | 53.9% | 633 | 48.6% | 562 | 44.9% | 439 | 35.3% |
| Reduced-Price Lunch Program Eligible: | 180 | 12.0% | 187 | 12.1% | 138 | 9.9% | 163 | 13.1% | 183 | 14.1% | 160 | 12.8% | 141 | 11.3% |
| Student-Teacher Ratio: | 24.27 | 22.95 | 18.09 | 18.18 | 20.80 | 20.10 | 19.10 | |||||||
Test Performance
| Year | Test | Grade | Measurement | Score | School District | State Average |
| ISAT | ||||||
| 2008 | Language Usage | 10th Grade | % met std | 61.8% | 62.9% | 68.8% |
| 2009 | Language Usage | 10th Grade | % met std | 32.1% | 29.4% | 40.7% |
| 2010 | Language Usage | 10th Grade | % met std | 62.4% | 67.3% | 71.5% |
| 2011 | Language Usage | 10th Grade | % met std | 70.3% | 69.3% | 72.6% |
| 2012 | Language Usage | 10th Grade | % met std | 73.1% | 73.1% | 76.6% |
| 2013 | Language Usage | 10th Grade | % met std | 72.9% | 68.7% | 72.3% |
| 2008 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 69.8% | 71.7% | 76.7% |
| 2009 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 32.8% | 33.9% | 44% |
| 2010 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 61.7% | 71.5% | 76.8% |
| 2011 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 72.2% | 74.6% | 78.5% |
| 2012 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 70.2% | 73% | 78% |
| 2013 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 74.3% | 73.1% | 76.4% |
| 2008 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 81% | 82.1% | 85.7% |
| 2009 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 35.5% | 41% | 58.5% |
| 2010 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 79.2% | 82.7% | 86.4% |
| 2011 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 83.6% | 84.5% | 87.2% |
| 2012 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 85.3% | 85.4% | 87.6% |
| 2013 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 90.2% | 87.1% | 89.2% |
| 2008 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 61.3% | 63.1% | 66.9% |
| 2009 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 51.9% | 55.6% | 68.6% |
| 2010 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 52.6% | 59.3% | 67.9% |
| 2011 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 60.2% | 63.8% | 69.3% |
| 2012 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 63% | 67.8% | 72.5% |
| 2013 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 71.4% | 70.4% | 72.7% |
| 2008 | Language Usage | 11th Grade | % met std | 17.8% | 17.1% | 21.8% |
| 2009 | Language Usage | 11th Grade | % met std | 25% | 19.4% | 26% |
| 2010 | Language Usage | 11th Grade | % met std | 25.6% | 23.4% | 31.3% |
| 2011 | Language Usage | 11th Grade | % met std | 14.9% | 21.1% | 26.4% |
| 2012 | Language Usage | 11th Grade | % met std | 18.2% | 21.9% | 32.9% |
| 2013 | Language Usage | 11th Grade | % met std | 11.3% | 13.6% | 23.5% |
| 2008 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 10.3% | 17.9% | 25.2% |
| 2009 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 10.3% | 14.7% | 23% |
| 2010 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 24.2% | 22.9% | 31.6% |
| 2011 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 15.9% | 18.3% | 28.6% |
| 2012 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 15% | 14.6% | 26.4% |
| 2013 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 16.4% | 17.2% | 25% |
| 2008 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 33.3% | 31.3% | 38.4% |
| 2009 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 18% | 25.5% | 38.4% |
| 2010 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 42% | 35.5% | 40.2% |
| 2011 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 21.6% | 36.6% | 37.9% |
| 2012 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 27% | 28.2% | 40.8% |
| 2013 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 32.1% | 41.4% | 38% |
| 2008 | Language Usage | 12th Grade | % met std | 20% | 16.7% | 25.6% |
| 2009 | Language Usage | 12th Grade | % met std | 13% | 14.5% | 24.6% |
| 2010 | Language Usage | 12th Grade | % met std | 25.6% | 22.8% | 31.2% |
| 2011 | Language Usage | 12th Grade | % met std | 13.3% | 21.5% | 23.8% |
| 2012 | Language Usage | 12th Grade | % met std | 32.4% | 21.9% | 21.5% |
| 2013 | Language Usage | 12th Grade | % met std | 17.2% | 13.7% | 18.9% |
| 2008 | Math | 12th Grade | % met std | 21% | 17.6% | 27.7% |
| 2009 | Math | 12th Grade | % met std | 17.2% | 15.8% | 24.7% |
| 2010 | Math | 12th Grade | % met std | 29.4% | 21.3% | 27.8% |
| 2011 | Math | 12th Grade | % met std | 8% | 21.4% | 23.1% |
| 2012 | Math | 12th Grade | % met std | 27.6% | 18% | 17.5% |
| 2013 | Math | 12th Grade | % met std | 6.9% | 16.5% | 18.9% |
| 2009 | Reading | 12th Grade | % met std | 30.8% | 30% | 40.5% |
| 2010 | Reading | 12th Grade | % met std | 22.3% | 18.6% | 40.1% |
| 2012 | Reading | 12th Grade | % met std | 25% | 26.5% | 29.9% |
| 2013 | Reading | 12th Grade | % met std | 26.7% | 20.8% | 28.5% |
| 2010 | Language Usage | 9th Grade | % met std | 53.4% | 57.9% | 63.3% |
| 2011 | Language Usage | 9th Grade | % met std | 55.2% | 56.6% | 62.8% |
| 2012 | Language Usage | 9th Grade | % met std | 58.1% | 57.5% | 66.1% |
| 2013 | Language Usage | 9th Grade | % met std | 48.8% | 53.7% | 62.4% |
| 2010 | Math | 9th Grade | % met std | 66.5% | 70% | 69.9% |
| 2011 | Math | 9th Grade | % met std | 58.8% | 65.7% | 69.5% |
| 2012 | Math | 9th Grade | % met std | 58.6% | 61.3% | 68.8% |
| 2013 | Math | 9th Grade | % met std | 53% | 58.1% | 66.6% |
| 2010 | Reading | 9th Grade | % met std | 79.6% | 81.4% | 80.8% |
| 2011 | Reading | 9th Grade | % met std | 75.2% | 76.9% | 81% |
| 2012 | Reading | 9th Grade | % met std | 71.9% | 74.4% | 80.9% |
| 2013 | Reading | 9th Grade | % met std | 75% | 77% | 82.3% |
Some data by SchoolDigger.com.
Teacher's Experience and Compensation
| 2007 | |
| Teachers with Bachelor Degree: | 56.7% |
| Teachers with Master or PhD Degree: | 40.0% |
| Mean Number of Years of Teaching: | 12.0 years |
| Teachers with 5 Years of Experience of Less: | 25.0% |
| Teachers with 6 Years of Experience or More: | 75.0% |
| Mean Base Salary: | $40,115.0 |
| Mean Base Salary of Teachers with 5 Years of Experience of Less: | $30,765.0 |
| Mean Base Salary of Teachers with 6 Years of Experience or More: | $43,231.0 |
* Nampa Senior High School was rated 3.5 out of 5 by USA.com. The ranking was calculated based on publically available historical Math and English performance data.